Modelling the non-separability of a very complex world
Description
We live in a very complex world. Much of this complexity manifests itself in ways
that are becoming increasingly well understood by practitioners of Complex Systems
Science (CSS), and yet some systems appear to be consistently defying our
understanding. Throughout the current incarnation of CSS, some methods
and approaches have posited a link between contextuality, or non-separability,
and complexity, but very little has come from these
works. Is the problem too complex?
While Complex System Science has traditionally addressed non-separable
behaviour ‘within systems, this workshop will seek to highlight approaches that
model situations of contextuality, where a system depends in a profound manner
upon factors traditionally deemed ‘external to it. Such factors might include:
measurement; historical contingency; environmental conditions; cultural
assumptions and mental states in human systems; etc. Importantly, contextually
dependent systems sometimes exhibit incompatibility between different contexts
and yet this important factor is very rarely acknowledged, let alone modelled, in
CSS.
Issues of contextuality have traditionally been addressed in quantum physics
and in linguistics, with applications covering particle physics, artificial intelligence
and machine learning. To the everyday applied scientist and practitioner,
this concern may appear somehow arcane and closer to the philosophy of science
than to the lab desk or the field work. However, it is now clear that many real
world problems of immense technological, economic and social impact cannot
be properly addressed without accounting for non-separability. We mention just
three examples in the fields of computer science, economics and social science: the
semantic web and machine translation cannot be achieved without addressing
the ’meaning’ of natural written language; disregarding any human behaviour
outside the scope of ’home economicus’ can have tragic impacts in the porting
of economic theory into policy making, as has been clear in the last couple of
years; discounting human perception of risk and the subtitles of negotiation profoundly
impacts the ability of community to address common problems of the magnitude of climate change. We believe CSS still lacks a formal approach to
these problems and we wish to explore some possible avenues.
We organised a workshop to highlight, compare and contrast innovative attempts
to model the contextuality and non-locality of very complex systems.
Such behaviour is often taken as indicative of ‘holism’ in the field, but we feel
that it has a number of characteristics, all of which can be made
more specific. Thus, while holism is a term frequently associated with Complex
Systems Science, it has yet to be truly incorporated into the analytical modelling
of complex systems. The workshop aimed to generate new interest in the actual
modelling of (rather than the philosophising about) effects that currently defy
the techniques in vogue in CSS.
The workshop had the following goals:
- to generate interest in the rigorous modelling of non-separable systems,
- to initiate and foster a cross-fertilisation and dialogue between researchers following different theoretical approaches (we expect contribution from such fields like physics, mathematics, statistics, information theory, computer science, philosophy of science, among others)
- to extend the boundaries of the field of complex systems modelling towards to areas of interest that are not generally well modelled by traditional scientific approaches.
Keynote speakers:
Professor James P. Crutchfield
Complexity Sciences,
University of California at David, USA
Causal Decompositions of Spacetime. Presumably, emergent patterns and
causal explanation are related. Typically, one strives to explain a system’s organization
in terms of underlying mechanism. But the enterprise is confounded
by measurement distortion, nonlinearity, and subjectivity. I will show that pattern
and causality are connected, in a principled way, by analyzing a system’s
information storage and processing.
Professor Didier Sornette
Economics, Complex System Science, Quantum Decision Theory
Eth, Zurich
Endogenous versus Exogenous Origins of Crises and Triumphs. We discover
a generic dynamical law characterizing the activity of systems going to and
following a peak, a crisis or a climax. A deep relationship is uncovered between
the response to exogenous shocks and the endogenous fluctuations of the activity
of systems driven by the epidemic-like interactions, such as word-of-mouth
contacts in social networks and triggering processes in natural systems. This
constitutes a kind of generalized fluctuation-susceptibility theorem of such outof-
equilibrium systems with punctuated dynamics. Applications include the dynamics
of commercial sales, YouTube video successes, financial volatility shocks,
market crashes, bursts of cyber-risks, social conflicts and crises, epileptic seizures,
earthquakes, landslides, climate dynamics and so on.
Dr. Michel Bitbol
Philosophy of modern physics and mind
Director of Research
CNRS, Paris, France
Contextuality and non-separability in the philosophy of quantum
physics. To account for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations (which are underpinned
by the entanglement of corresponding state vectors), one is usually
left with a choice between renouncing the claim that quantum mechanics is a
complete description of reality and renouncing some form of locality. Yet, it has
recently been shown that a coherent application of the relational interpretation
of quantum mechanics bypasses this dilemma. Provided one accepts that states
as well as properties are relative to certain experimental operations, one can
stick to locality without supposing that quantum theory is incomplete. In other
terms, one can recover locality and completeness provided contextuality is fully
taken into account (although, at this point, completeness has lost its usual realist
meaning). Non-separability is then interpreted as an outcome of the whole
situation of production of phenomena, rather than a feature of the objects that
allegedly manifest through these phenomena. In this talk, Ill examine successive
versions of this contextual approach of non-separability. These versions sometimes
appear as conflicting, since they arise from either radical empiricism or
extreme formalism. But they have a common root that is well displayed by the
relational interpretation of quantum mechanics. Some objections to the contextual
approach of non-separability are finally discussed and rebutted.
Back
Contributed Talks
Riccardo Franco and Guido Zuccon. Social tagging, guppy effect, and the role of
interference: Social tagging systems are shown to evidence a well known
cognitive heuristic, the guppy eect, which arises from the combination
of dierent concepts. We present some empirical evidence of this eect,
drawn from a popular social tagging Web service. The guppy eect is
then described using a quantum inspired formalism that has been al-
ready successfully applied to model conjunction fallacy and probability
judgement errors. Key to the formalism is the concept of interference,
which is able to capture and quantify the strength of the guppy effect. PDF
Cedric Boeckx. Syntactic Order for Free: Taking the in
uential, reductionist characterization of the
human language faculty by Hauser, Chomsky, and Fitch (2002), I argue
that a separationist approach to this central cognitive attribute faces
challenges that a more emergentist position avoids. I then turn to a
characterization of natural language syntax as a complex dynamic system
that is capable of producing attested structures (here claimed to be
Turing patterns) in the absence of traditional lexical supervision. The
contribution concludes with an analysis of the cognitive ecology of the
language faculty, and how language relates to/interfaces with mental
modules PDF
Kirsty Kitto and Peter
Bruza. Meaning in Context: Language exhibits a number of contextuality and non-separability
effects. This paper reviews a new set of models showing promise for capturing
this complexity which are based upon a quantum-like approach PDF
Contacts:
Back
|